
while surfing on the web, i discovered that you used
one of our commercial fonts to design your http://www.moorstation.org/typoasis/typoasis1.htm
page. the decorative symbols that appear on that page
are all taken from our FF Mambo Medium Initials font. since you have apparently
been offering illegal clone versions of our fonts on your website and are
such a strong advocate of shareware fonts, i felt compelled to check our
sales records but could not find any evidence that you have actually purchased
any of our fonts.
if you have used our FF Mambo Medium Initials to create
the images on your website but have not paid for it, please purchase the
font legally from our German distributor at the following address as soon
as possible:
FontShop Berlin
Bergmannstr. 102
10961 Berlin
Tel. (030) 695 895
Fax. (030) 692 8865
e-mail: info@fontshop.de
if you have used a shareware clone of FF Mambo to design
your site, i request that you immediately stop using it and destroy all
copies of it, and remove the FF Mambo decorative symbols from your page
design. Please also destroy all other FontFont clones that you have. you
should be aware that all shareware clones of our fonts have all been created
illegally and without our consent, and we do take legal action against
such piracy cases. however, through sites like yours, rip-off font versions
continue to be distributed by other people long after we have stopped the
pirates, and
this is why many people still believe that the shareware
clones are legal, even though this is not at all true. you should know
that type designers earn their living through the royalties they get from
font sales. when you distribute illegal clones, you do irreparable financial
damage to the font designers who create the fonts.
i honestly have no problems with people distributing and using shareware, as long as it REALLY is legal shareware. i just wanted to make sure you understand that our fonts are commercial software, and that ALL the cloned versions of our fonts are NOT legal and should NOT be used or distributed. please understand that when you give away our fonts or copies of our fonts for free, you are stealing other people's livelihoods.
if you really and truly love fonts and typography,
please support the type designers and typefoundries who create them.
thanks.
bye,
MLT
FSI FontShop International
Bergmannstr. 102
10961 Berlin
Germany
Tel. +49 (30) 693 7022
Fax. +49 (30) 692 8443
"Maraca Extra" is indeed an illegal clone of our FF Mambo, and it does contain clones of all the FF Mambo Mexican-style symbols. the decorative Mambo symbols you used on your site are all located on the http://www.moorstation.org/typoasis/typoasis1.htm page, as follows:
1. the smiling sun with sunglasses symbol at the top of the page, in the "O" of "TypOasis"
2. the cactus symbol on the upper left-hand side of the page, inside the letter "C"
3. the martini symbol on the middle left-hand side of the page, inside the letter "v"
4. the palm-tree symbol on the lower left-hand side of the page, next to the "Links" section
5. the lizard symbol on the middle right-hand side of the page, inside the letter "A"
6. the mexican sombrero symbol on the lower right-hand of the page, on top of the letter "Q"
7. the smiling sun with sunglasses symbol at the very bottom of the page, in the "O" of "TypoOasis".
if you really like the FF Mambo symbols, and want to continue using them, you can purchase it as a single weight (it's called "FF Mambo Medium Initials") for only DM 90,- from our FontFont CD, available from FontShop Berlin.
if you're not sure if some of your shareware fonts
are clones of our fonts, you can see samples of our entire font library
at www.fontfont.de, and starting in May, you can test the fonts and purchase
them online at www.fontfont.com.
thanks!!
bye,
MLT
I had a detailed look on your FF Mambo Initials as they are displayed on your web-site. The letters are completely different and some of the picture characters, too. The most important thing for me: Maraca Extra is definitively of superior quality.
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999 11:28:27 +0100, T. T. Mai-Linh
wrote:
>
>>hi pee.
>>
>>well, frankly i don't know what WSI's claim to legality
is, but if you
>>check the trademark information in their font data,
it says "Copyright
>>1993, 1996". however, we have written contracts
that prove that the font
>>Mambo was designed in 1992 by Canadian designer
Val Fullard and that she
>>granted us exclusive distribution rights for the
font design in 1992.
>>
I cannot see this information, all I see is "Digital
Data of the WSI font collection".
>
>>of course, you can make life easy for yourself by
choosing not to believe
>>me, but honestly i don't think this really absolves
you of all
>>responsibility, especially now that you have been
informed of the truth.
>>
Obviously you are trying to make me feel guilty. You
say that I have been informed of the truth, but for some reason you never
sent any of the stuff that you describe as the truth. So why don't you
prove everything you claim to be the truth?
>
>>we are now taking legal action against WSI for stealing
the Mambo design,
>>but this is a completely separate issue and does
not change the fact that
>>you personally must still choose whether or not
to pay for the legal use of
>>the font design or stop using the illegal clone
version.
>>
I can't believe that you are taking legal steps against
WSI. The last thing on record is Adobe against SSI, and nothing else. I'm
afraid that your odds of making a case for yourself are somewhere between
0 and -5 out of 100.
>
>>you argue that "If WSI's copy was illegal they wouldn't
talk about this
>>font on their site and sell it", but that's like
saying that murder is not
>>a crime because people do it all the time, therefore
it must be okay. you
>>know just as well as i do that there are plenty
of people and companies in
>>the world who commit crimes simply because they
gain certain advantages
>>from it, and also because they have not been caught
and stopped yet.
>>
What is this, a kind of brain washing? I found out
that I have this Maraca Extras font on a CD that has been delivered with
a piece of hardware. If you have issues, take them up with the person who
profited from the font you think was stolen from your company. As a.m.
Maracas Extras is different.
>
>>please think carefully about all the implications
of your actions. i hope
>>you will do the right thing.
>>
You are assuming that I do not have a conscience and
want to give me a crash course on how to develop one? Why don't you stop
harassing me?
>
Regards - CybaPee
>
We downloaded their data and compared the characters
to ours, and they were copied exactly as one-to-one copies from our PostScript
data. There is no difference in the letterforms. And TrueType can never
have better quality than PostScript, simply because it is physically a
much more limited data format, where the printer font and the screen font
are jammed together into
a single font file. It seems like you are just looking
for an excuse to feel justified in not having to pay for the designer's
work. The point is, whether or not you "like" their version better, their
version is still an illegal copy, which you perhaps unknowingly used at
the time. But now that you know the truth, you have a responsibility to
act honorably towards the true designer of the font.
As I said, if you really loved fonts and typography as I do, you would also be willing support them. It makes me really sad that so many people who claim to love fonts are always so quick to rip off the designers who did all the work. Please reconsider.
MLT

There was a Peignot on my site with the entry "Macromedia Fontographer". The original Peignot has been designed 1937 by A.M. Cassandre, now it's a standard font sold by nearly every font foundry. There are versions around with the name Penguin (Corel), PigNose or Peridot (Rubicon), some are free, others are Shareware versions. I don't know why Mr.Steinert is referring to a font without a Linotype entry in it, but I will replace the Peignot with a Peridot or so.
>From your illegitimate, world-wide passing on of our mental property a substantial economic damage results to us at >least within the six-digit DM area. Since we cannot imagine that you want to expose yourselves to our claims for >damages as well as further legal measures and we ask first to assume that you operate your Website in unawareness >of the legal surrounding field, we you hereby most politely to close and put only then again into operation this Site >immediately, if you guaranteed free of doubts that the offered data do not violate the rights third.
I checked all pages and could not find any Linotype font. So it is indeed a surprising calculation, this "six-digit DM area" for no Linotype font on my pages...
>For the acceleration of the process we transmit this writing by email. Your address is well-known to us.
How clever! It's not so difficult to look up this information,
because this is not an illegal site! What did he expect?
Whatever - I closed my pages temporarily to get them
checked and they will be back within some days. And the next threatening
mail will be replied in the same way if the cooperative way has no effect.

Jay Rutherford
The Rutherford Press (one of the small guys)
Prellerstr. 16
99423 Weimar
Germany
* Is it OK to sell drugs as long as you don't make them yourself?
P.S. I have the guts to post my address here. Do you have the guts to post this note on your site?
Why not, Professor?
I am trying to protect my interests - enjoying fonts,
playing with PSP-design on fonts, share and collect them. Without profit.
Just for fun. If a commercial font should be found on my site, this is
not intended and it will be removed as soon as I am told about it (see
page 1). So what is the problem? Be happy that you didn't have to see my
one and only attempt to get a font done with Softy :-)